$ 11.99 · 5 (599) · In stock
The lawsuit says Thinx underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contains harmful chemical substances known as PFAS. The company denies those allegations but will pay up to $5 million.
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - Good Morning America
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us
What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us
Thinx settled a lawsuit over chemicals in its period underwear. Here's what to know
Thinx to pay millions to settle class-action lawsuit alleging its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
Thinx to pay millions to settle class-action lawsuit alleging its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
Graham Peaslee, Notre Dame News
PFAS Class-Action Lawsuit Provides Over $11 Billion For Affected Public Water Systems - T&M
Here's who is eligible for money from 3M PFAS contamination settlement
Fun & Draconian Tricks For A Happy, Equitable, Green World
STEEP researcher served as expert witness in settled Minnesota v. 3M lawsuit – STEEP